Author: Alexandra Krasovec

Alexandra Krasovec

Alex is a member of one of the nation’s most prominent and knowledgeable Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defense teams. She has defended financial institutions and businesses of varying sizes against individual TCPA claims and nationwide class actions. Always staying on the forefront of TCPA developments, Alex works with this team of litigators to craft arguments and strategies aimed at curtailing the reach of the TCPA, both in court and through policy efforts before the Federal Communications Commission.

View Full Bio on Dorsey

FCC Creates New TCPA Safe Harbor and Reassigned Phone Number Database

Dorsey’s team has been monitoring and reporting the latest happenings at the FCC, including the FCC’s draft order on the reassigned number database and its public comments during Monday’s Open Commission Meeting. If you didn’t receive a copy of our e-update, please reach out to any member of our team for a copy. As expected, the FCC adopted yesterday its draft order directing the creation...

TCPA Roundup: A Week of Blockbuster News from the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit, the FCC, and a Few District Courts

If you follow daily TCPA news like we do, your head is probably spinning from this week’s developments. We normally digest TCPA developments for our readers in a monthly e-newsletter. (If you’d like to join this list, please drop us a line.) November has delivered some blockbuster news, however, and we decided to highlight some of the notable developments in this mid-month TCPA Roundup. SCOTUS...

Fall is for Falling Leaves, Thanksgiving, and TCPA Omnibus II?

As this year speeds to a close, we are on pins and needles to see if the FCC will issue a ruling this Fall in the great ACA Int’l TCPA remand.  After all, the FCC provided only two weeks for comment in its latest Public Notice Seeking Further Comment, issued after the Ninth Circuit’s anachronistic ruling in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC this September....

Circuit Split Pronounced by District Court’s Application of Statutory Definition of an ATDS

While recent TCPA coverage has focused on the Ninth Circuit’s landmark ruling in Marks v. Crunch, a subsequent ruling from a New Jersey District Court serves has a reminder that (thankfully) the Ninth Circuit remains an “ATDS” definition outlier. For more on Marks, please see Dorsey’s coverage here and Dorsey partner Scott Goldsmith’s interview with Law360 here. To recap, the TCPA prevents calls to cell phones...

Ninth Circuit Rules an ATDS Need Only Have the Capacity to “Store Numbers to Be Called” and Dial “Automatically”

In Marks v. Crunch San Diego, No. 14-56834, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26883 (9th Cir. Sept. 20, 2018), a three judge panel found “the term ‘automatic telephone dialing system’ means equipment which has the capacity (1) to store numbers to be called, or (2) to produce numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator-and to dial such numbers automatically (even if the...

The Ever-Evolving Interpretation of an ATDS: Where Are We Now? (No, Really!)

On May 5, 2018, a broad range of 18 industry groups led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, including ACA International and members of the financial services industry, petitioned the FCC to seek clarity on the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system in light of the D.C. Circuit’s March 16, 2018 decision in ACA Int’l. v. FCC, which vacated the FCC’s prior ATDS interpretation as unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious.

PSA: FCC Seeks Comment on Reassigned Number Databases and the Creation of a TCPA Safe Harbor

As we reported last month, on the heels of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in ACA Int’l v. FCC, the D.C. Circuit has created a tabula rasa for the FCC’s treatment of reassigned numbers under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The FCC now seeks to clarify the interplay between that decision and the Commission’s ongoing efforts to establish one or more reassigned number databases.

Back to Basics: What is an “ATDS,” Really?

Following the D.C. Circuit’s opinion in ACA Int’l v. FCC, No. 15-1211, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 6535 at *9 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 16, 2018), members of the Bar on all sides have found themselves potentially living in a throwback era. This is particularly true with respect to what may or may not qualify as an automatic telephone dialing system, or “ATDS,” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq.